SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972113

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KAILASH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSS 1666 / 2025



Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS 1666/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Amish Tewari, Advocate, for

the petitioners.

Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional

CSC, for the State.

Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate, for

the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission. (2) Petitioner no. 1 and 2 are serving as Assistant Teacher, LT Grade, while petitioner no. 3 is serving as Lecturer in different government institutions. Petitioners are desirous of applying for the post of Principal, Government Inter College, regarding which selection process is currently underway. As per the applicable rules, an Assistant Teacher, LT Grade with 15 years of experience as such can also apply for the post of Principal, while for Lecturers the required experience is only 10 years. Petitioners do not meet the requirement regarding experience on the post of Assistant Teacher, LT Grade/Lecturer, therefore they are not in a position to apply for the post of Principal, which has been advertised by Public Service

Commission.

(3) Petitioners contend that as they served as Assistant Teacher in different Government Junior High Schools for sufficiently long period of time, therefore, the services rendered in Government Junior High Schools may be treated as services rendered in the cadre of Assistant Teacher, LT Grade/Lecturer. In this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following

reliefs:

“I. a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus directing the respondents to count the teaching experience of the petitioner as assistant teacher Junior high school for participating in the promotional excise for the post of Principal which is being conducted by way of limited departmental examination pursuant to the advertisement dated 18.9.2025. Contained in annexure no. 1 to the writ petition.

II. a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to take decision upon the representation dated

1.10.2025 Annexure no. 11 to the writ petition.”

(4) Learned Counsels for the respondents submit that if petitioner makes representation highlighting their grievance, the competent authority in the Commission shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders.

(5) Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioners to make separate fresh representations within one week from today. If petitioners make such representation within the stipulated time, competent authority in the selecting body shall take decision thereupon within three weeks thereafter.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

10.10.2025 Pr P K R U A M B A O R DH DU26s8De.C TiN a 5r g ti :4ae 7 Atc l: a 3F2N =R 2 l ,30 I u0 y pN C=mK o s, 93i so b ga .tA=0e n 0 N 5 H r8l e C=72DId oG Ba ,d b D H0E e y C C=3aP 1: O9,2 R c567 UA na3E2 B =f08 TO P9D + D R1,0 FH CsaB tA K9 '=O3 T 6 U5 0UD M TEH9A 17 KA6 R4URB3 K 9MaH 4fK8A 0HR N E2 F D1Nc, D5o08,u 6=H2A IfG C6He aC 1 O A4U B R 56T 81 aOf03F 52eDFb619C8Ad54

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top