HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KAILASH CHANDRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSS 1666 / 2025
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
S N L o . .
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPSS 1666/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Amish Tewari, Advocate, for
the petitioners.
Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional
CSC, for the State.
Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate, for
the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission. (2) Petitioner no. 1 and 2 are serving as Assistant Teacher, LT Grade, while petitioner no. 3 is serving as Lecturer in different government institutions. Petitioners are desirous of applying for the post of Principal, Government Inter College, regarding which selection process is currently underway. As per the applicable rules, an Assistant Teacher, LT Grade with 15 years of experience as such can also apply for the post of Principal, while for Lecturers the required experience is only 10 years. Petitioners do not meet the requirement regarding experience on the post of Assistant Teacher, LT Grade/Lecturer, therefore they are not in a position to apply for the post of Principal, which has been advertised by Public Service
Commission.
(3) Petitioners contend that as they served as Assistant Teacher in different Government Junior High Schools for sufficiently long period of time, therefore, the services rendered in Government Junior High Schools may be treated as services rendered in the cadre of Assistant Teacher, LT Grade/Lecturer. In this writ petition, petitioners have sought the following
reliefs:
“I. a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus directing the respondents to count the teaching experience of the petitioner as assistant teacher Junior high school for participating in the promotional excise for the post of Principal which is being conducted by way of limited departmental examination pursuant to the advertisement dated 18.9.2025. Contained in annexure no. 1 to the writ petition.
II. a writ, order or direction in the nature mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 to take decision upon the representation dated
1.10.2025 Annexure no. 11 to the writ petition.”
(4) Learned Counsels for the respondents submit that if petitioner makes representation highlighting their grievance, the competent authority in the Commission shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders.
(5) Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to petitioners to make separate fresh representations within one week from today. If petitioners make such representation within the stipulated time, competent authority in the selecting body shall take decision thereupon within three weeks thereafter.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
10.10.2025 Pr P K R U A M B A O R DH DU26s8De.C TiN a 5r g ti :4ae 7 Atc l: a 3F2N =R 2 l ,30 I u0 y pN C=mK o s, 93i so b ga .tA=0e n 0 N 5 H r8l e C=72DId oG Ba ,d b D H0E e y C C=3aP 1: O9,2 R c567 UA na3E2 B =f08 TO P9D + D R1,0 FH CsaB tA K9 '=O3 T 6 U5 0UD M TEH9A 17 KA6 R4URB3 K 9MaH 4fK8A 0HR N E2 F D1Nc, D5o08,u 6=H2A IfG C6He aC 1 O A4U B R 56T 81 aOf03F 52eDFb619C8Ad54
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.