SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972115

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KULDEEP NANDRAJOG – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

10TH OCTOBER, 2025

SECOND BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.177 of 2025

Kuldeep Nandrajog ..…Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Sharang Dhulia,

Advocate through

video conferencing.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Joshi,

Assistant Government

Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

Applicant-Kuldeep Nandrajog is in judicial

custody for the offence punishable under Section 420 and Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 in Case Crime No.215 of 2024, registered at Police Station

Bahadarabad, District Haridwar.

2. The First Bail Application (No.1038 of 2025) was dismissed as withdrawn on 17.06.2025 with liberty

to file afresh.

3. The informant Smt. Uma Sharma lodged the First Information Report against five persons including the present applicant alleging that she had invested a sum of Rs.9,86,500/-(Rupees Nine Lakh Eighty Six

Thousand Five Hundred) for a plot with M/S Octagon Builders and Promoters Private Ltd., but the builder has not yet handed over the plot to her. Now, the builder is allotting undeveloped plot.

4. Heard Mr. Sharang Dhulia, learned counsel for the ap

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top