SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972118

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ANKIT SAH AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports,

SL. orders or proceedings or

Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

No directions and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPCRL No. 1223 of 2025

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J .

Mr. T.P.S. Takuli, learned counsel for the Petitioners.

2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned A.G.A. for the State of

Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Pushpa Joshi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Mr. Akhil Kumar Sah and Mr. Ayush Agrawal, learned

counsels for Respondent No.4.

4. The present Criminal Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted by the Petitioners- (1) Ankit Sah S/o Sri Basant Lal Sah, (2) Vikky Sah alias Vinay Sah S/o Lacchi Lal Sah, (3) Chandan Nainwal alias Mohan Chandra Nainwal S/o Sri Keshav Datt Nainwal, (4) Tanni alias Tarun Thakur S/o Sri Harish Singh, (5) Suresh Joshi alias Suresh Chandra Joshi S/o Sri Amba Datt, (6) Pawan Bhatt alias Pawan Chandra Bhatt S/o Sri Kailash Chandra Bhatt, (7) Hittu Sah alias Hitesh Sah S/o Sri Basant Lal Sah, (8) Gopal Gariya alias Gopal Singh S/o Sri Pratap Singh, (9) Bharat Nainwal S/o Sri Rajendra Chandra Nainwal, (10) Bhaskar Pandey alias Bhagwan Chandra S/o Sri Gopal Datt, (11) Pushkar Singh Panaura S/o Sri Ganga Singh Pana

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top