SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972139

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SAHIL AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

BA1 No.923 of 2025

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Kurban Ali and Ms. Lubhna

Jahan, Advocates for the applicant.

Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarahand.

2. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in Case Crime No.02 of 2025, under Sections 77, 351 (2)(3), 69 B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 (c) of I.T. Act, registered at Police Thana Kotwali Kotdwar, District

Pauri Garhwal.

3. According to the averments contained in the First Information Report, it is alleged that the applicant created two fictitious Instagram accounts in the name of the complainant and, by operating the said accounts, demanded money from her. It is further alleged that the applicant criminally intimidated the complainant by extending threats of doing away her brother and also solicited from her certain obscene photographs

along with a photograph of her mother.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant contends that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and has no criminal antecedents. It is submitted that the applica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top