HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AJAY KISHOR BAHUGUNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAI NI TAL
HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE SRI G. NARENDAR
AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SUBHASH UPADHYAY
14TH OCTOBER, 2025
WRI T PETI TI ON ( S/ B) No. 439 OF 2025
Ajay Kishor Bahuguna.
…Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others.
…Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, learned
counsel.
Counsel for respondent no. 1. : Mr. Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned
Additional Advocate General for the
State of Uttarakhand.
Counsel for respondent nos. 2 & : Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned
3. counsel.
JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.)
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and the
learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3 -
University.
2. The petitioner has sought for the following reliefs :
“(i) Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of Quo Warranto against Respondent No. 4, to declare such continuation on the post of Registrar of G.B. Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology, Ghurdauri, Pauri Garhwal as illegal, on the strength of appointment order dated 02-12- 2019, (Annexure no-13), and further the Respondent no 4 be removed/divested from the post of Registrar of G.B. Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology, Ghurdau
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.