SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972151

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AJAY KISHOR BAHUGUNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

HON’BLE THE CHI EF JUSTI CE SRI G. NARENDAR

AND

HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SUBHASH UPADHYAY

14TH OCTOBER, 2025

WRI T PETI TI ON ( S/ B) No. 439 OF 2025

Ajay Kishor Bahuguna.

…Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others.

…Respondents

Counsel for the petitioner. : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Chauhan, learned

counsel.

Counsel for respondent no. 1. : Mr. Amarendra Pratap Singh, learned

Additional Advocate General for the

State of Uttarakhand.

Counsel for respondent nos. 2 & : Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, learned

3. counsel.

JUDGMENT : (per Sri G. Narendar, C.J.)

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, and the

learned Standing Counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3 -

University.

2. The petitioner has sought for the following reliefs :

“(i) Issue a Writ order or direction in the nature of Quo Warranto against Respondent No. 4, to declare such continuation on the post of Registrar of G.B. Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology, Ghurdauri, Pauri Garhwal as illegal, on the strength of appointment order dated 02-12- 2019, (Annexure no-13), and further the Respondent no 4 be removed/divested from the post of Registrar of G.B. Pant Institute of Engineering and Technology, Ghurdau

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top