SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972152

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RENUKA WHEELER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS/ 435/ 2024

With

WPSS/ 529/ 2024

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. B.S. Koranga, Advocate for the

petitioners.

Mr. N.K. Papnoi, State Counsel for the

State.

Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate holding

brief of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the

Commission.

2. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, therefore they are heard together and are being decided by a common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of Writ Petition No. 435 of 2025

(SS) alone are being discussed and considered.

3. Petitioner possesses requisite qualification for appointment as Nursing Officer (Male/Female) in Department of Medical Health and also the Medical Education Department. She is aggrieved by condition No. 7 mentioned in advertisement dated 11.03.2024, which provides that every candidate who applies for the post of Nursing Officer must be below 42

years of age as on 01.07.2023.

4. Admittedly, petitioner had crossed upper age limit on the date specified in the advertisement. In Writ Petition No. 435 of 2024

(SS), petitioner has sought following r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top