HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RENUKA WHEELER – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPSS/ 435/ 2024
With
WPSS/ 529/ 2024
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. B.S. Koranga, Advocate for the
petitioners.
Mr. N.K. Papnoi, State Counsel for the
State.
Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate holding
brief of Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the
Commission.
2. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, therefore they are heard together and are being decided by a common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of Writ Petition No. 435 of 2025
(SS) alone are being discussed and considered.
3. Petitioner possesses requisite qualification for appointment as Nursing Officer (Male/Female) in Department of Medical Health and also the Medical Education Department. She is aggrieved by condition No. 7 mentioned in advertisement dated 11.03.2024, which provides that every candidate who applies for the post of Nursing Officer must be below 42
years of age as on 01.07.2023.
4. Admittedly, petitioner had crossed upper age limit on the date specified in the advertisement. In Writ Petition No. 435 of 2024
(SS), petitioner has sought following r
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.