SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972154

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KULDEEP SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions and COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

No

Registrar’s order with

Signatures

WPCRL No. 1239 of 2025

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J .

Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State of

Uttarakhand.

3. Ms. Shazia Siddiqui, learned counsel for Respondent No.

3.

4. The present Criminal Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted by the Petitioner–Kuldeep Singh, against the Respondents, particularly

Respondent No. 3, with the following prayer:

“(i) A writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R., registered as Case Crime No. 134 of 2024, under Sections 323, 342, 376-D, 504, 506 of the I.P.C., Police Station Khanpur, District

Haridwar.”

5. Today, the matter is listed for disposal of I.A. No. 01 of 2025 (Paper No. 15), being an application for compounding of offences. The application has been filed on the ground that the parties have amicably resolved their dispute, which had essentially arisen out of matrimonial discord. It is stated that the parties have now arrived at a mutual compromise and wish to

bring the proc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top