SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972157

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SUSHIL KUMAR ARYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

14TH OCTOBER, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.1116 of 2025

Sushil Kumar Arya .....Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Another ..…Respondents

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Navneet Kaushik,

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Akshay Latwal,

Assistant Government

Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This Application has been filed by the

applicant- Sushil Kumar Arya for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.115 of 2021 (Special Sessions Trial No.26 of 2021), registered at Police Station Jhabrera, District Haridwar. The present case is pending for the offence under Section 376(2)(n), Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 3(1)(w)(i)(ii) and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989

(in short, “Act, 1989”).

2. Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate, submitted on instruction that

the informant-victim has been informed by the Investigating Officer. There is no representation from the informant’s side.

3. According to the First Information Report dated 13.03.2021, the informant was a student at the intermed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top