SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972168

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VIJAY KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

15th OCTOBER, 2025

FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 1942 of 2025

Vijay Kumar ..…Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat,

Assistant Government Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The applicant Vijay Kumar is in judicial

custody for the offence under Section 8 read with Section 21 and Section 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, “Act, 1985”) in Case Crime No.386 of 2025, registered at

Police Station Bahadrabad, District Haridwar.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 05.10.2025, on suspicion, the applicant was apprehended by the police. The police recovered 35.31

gm. smack from his polythene. He was arrested.

3. Heard Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Virendra Singh Rawat, learned

Assistant Government Advocate for respondent.

4. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, contended that

the applicant has been implicated by the police. The alleged recovery was planted. The said contraband was not recovered from his possession. There wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top