SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972185

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANJAY KUMAR SAINI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

15TH OCTOBER, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.195 of 2025

Sanjay Kumar Saini .....Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Gaurav Singh,

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey,

Assistant Government

Advocate assisted by

Mrs. Sweta Badola

Dobhal, Brief Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This Application has been filed by the

applicant- Sanjay Kumar Saini for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.18 of 2025, registered at Police Station Rajpur, District Dehradun under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468 and Section 471 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860.

2. As per the First Information Report, a plot was shown to the informant by the present applicant and other co-accused. The sale-deed was executed by co-accused Sampurnanand Tyagi on 20.11.2021, but the name of the informant could not be recorded in the revenue record because the owner of the said plot is

someone else.

3. Heard Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pratiroop Pandy, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent.

4. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate, has contended

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top