SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972206

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHRI FAROOKH ALI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS/ 1699/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Dinesh Kumar Tyagi and Mr. Brahm

Dev, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, Deputy

Advocate General for the State.

2. Petitioner is serving as Senior Personal Assistant in Post Graduate College, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, since 2022. He is aggrieved by order dated 30.08.2025, passed by Joint Director of Higher Education, Harldwani, whereby he was attached in Government Post Graduate College, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal. Feeling aggrieved by his attachment,

petitioner has approached this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s attachment is without any justification. He submits that a complaint, not supported by affidavit, was filed by someone who claims to be member of Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) and without verifying the allegation made in the complaint,

petitioner was attached at Kotdwar.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has drawn attention of this Court to a document enclosed as Annexure-4 to the writ petition, for contending that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top