SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972207

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AVIRAL PRATAP SINGH BISHT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS 1708/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Navnish Negi, Advocate, for

the petitioner.

Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, Additional

CSC, for the State.

(2) Petitioner’s mother was employed as Lecturer (Mathematics) in a government aided intermediate college, namely, Arya Kanya Inter College, Kotdwar, District Pauri Garhwal, who died on 23.5.2024. Petitioner has applied for compassionate appointment. Decision on his application, however, has not been taken so far, therefore petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking a direction to Chief Education Officer, Pauri to take decision on

his application.

(3) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Regulation 93 of Regulations framed under Uttarakhand School Education Act provides for compassionate appointment in government aided schools. He thus submits that delay on the part of the competent authority in taking decision

in the matter is unjust.

(4) Learned State Counsel, by referring to Annexure-3 to the writ petition, submits that the Management of the concerned school has not forwarded the

compassionate a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top