HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NAFEES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
SL. proceedings or
Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
No directions and
Registrar’s order with Signatures
WPCRL No. 1271 of 2025
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J .
Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Petitioners.
2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned A.G.A. for the State of
Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Subhash Joshi, learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 3
and 4.
4. The present Criminal Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted by the Petitioners against the Respondents, particularly Respondent Nos. 3 and 4,
with the following prayers:
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 25.04.2024, registered as F.I.R. No. 0286 of 2024, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 307, 325, 341, 504, and 506 of the I.P.C., 1860, at Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, lodged by Respondent No. 3 against the Petitioners, in view of the amicable
settlement arrived at between the parties.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 not to arrest the Petitioners and not to take any coercive measures against them in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.