SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972210

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NAFEES – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or

SL. proceedings or

Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

No directions and

Registrar’s order with Signatures

WPCRL No. 1271 of 2025

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J .

Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the Petitioners.

2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned A.G.A. for the State of

Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Subhash Joshi, learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 3

and 4.

4. The present Criminal Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted by the Petitioners against the Respondents, particularly Respondent Nos. 3 and 4,

with the following prayers:

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 25.04.2024, registered as F.I.R. No. 0286 of 2024, for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 307, 325, 341, 504, and 506 of the I.P.C., 1860, at Police Station Kotwali Roorkee, District Haridwar, lodged by Respondent No. 3 against the Petitioners, in view of the amicable

settlement arrived at between the parties.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 not to arrest the Petitioners and not to take any coercive measures against them in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top