SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972216

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANOJ SINGH NEGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

BA1 No.1707 of 2025

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Ajay Joshi, Advocate for the

applicant.

Mr. B.N. Molakhi, Deputy Advocate

General for the State of Uttarahand.

2. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in Case Crime/F.I.R. No.29 of 2024, under Sections 376 I.P.C. and Section 5(j)(ii) read with Section 6 of POCSO Act, registered at

Police Station Lamgara, District Almora.

3. On 19.06.2024, the informant, being the father of the victim, lodged a First Information Report stating that when he took his daughter to the hospital due to her ill health, the attending doctor disclosed that she was seven months pregnant. Upon inquiry by her father, the victim revealed that the applicant had allegedly enticed her and, by use of force, established physical

relations against her will.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case and bears no criminal antecedents. It is further contended that the applicant has been languishing in judicial custody since 16.07.2024. On the dat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top