SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972239

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SMT ANKITA AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
SMT MAMTA AGARWAL – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition Misc. Single No. 2509 of 2021

28th October, 2025

Smt Ankita Agarwal and another ………Petitioners

Versus

Smt Mamta Agarwal and another ………….Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Nagesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Ramji Shrivastava, Advocate for respondent no.1.

There is no representation for respondent no.2.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

This writ petition has been filed under Article

227 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioners- defendants have put to challenge the judgment and order dated 29.09.2021, passed by learned IVth Additional District Judge, Dehradun, in Misc. Civil Appeal No.91 of 2019, Smt. Mamta Agarwal Vs. Smt. Ankita Agarwal and others, whereby the misc. civil appeal filed by the respondent no.1-plaintiff was allowed and the judgment and order passed by learned trial court dated 16.10.2019 whereby issue nos.3 and 4 were decided in favour of the petitioners-defendants and against respondent no.1-

plaintiff, was set aside.

2. Facts of the case in brief are that an Original Suit No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top