SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972255

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MATEEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

29th OCTOBER, 2025

FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.1554 of 2025

Mateen ..…Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey,

Assistant Government Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

Applicant-Mateen is in judicial custody for the

offence punishable under Section 3, Section 5 read with Section 11 (1) of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 in Case Crime No.151 of 2025, registered at Police Station ITI, District Udham Singh

Nagar.

2. According to the First Information Report, on a secret information, the police raided the spot on 05.06.2025 and recovered 262 kg. beef and other articles from the spot. The applicant, the co-accused

Sarfaraz and other co-accused were arrested.

3. Heard Mr. Mohd Safdar, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned

Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent.

4. Mr. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate, submitted that the alleged beef was not recovered from the possession of the applicant. He was not involved in the said offence. He has been implicat

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top