HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UMED SINGH RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
RAJPAL SINGH RAWAT – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
A.O. No.368 of 2025
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Vikas Bahuguna, Advocate for the
appellant.
Mr. Neeraj Garg, Advocate for respondent
no.3.
2. This Appeal from Order has been preferred by the appellant assailing the order dated 08.09.2025 passed by the learned IIIrd Additional Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun, in Original Suit No. 49 of 2023, whereby the learned Court below has allowed Application No. 98C2 filed by respondent no.3/defendant no. 3 under Section 151 read with Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of C.P.C. and restrained the plaintiff/appellant from interfering in the peaceful possession of respondent no. 3 over the property in
question.
3. The facts giving rise to the present appeal, briefly stated, are that the appellant instituted Original Suit No. 49 of 2023, seeking cancellation of Gift Deed dated 08.11.2021 executed by him in favour of respondent no. 1, who happens to be his real son. It is the case of the appellant that the said Gift Deed was executed out of love and affection; however, the same was obtained through
misrepresentation and undue influence
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.