SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972292

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHAN PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPMS 2939/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Rajedra Arya, Advocate, for

the petitioner.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing

Counsel, for the State.

Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for

the respondent no. 2 and 3.

(2) Petitioner is resident of Village Ala, Tehsil Ghat, District Chamoli. According to him, Public Works Department constructed Ramni-Peri Motor Road and during hill cutting, debris had fallen on rivulets and water channels, due to which they changed their course and caused substantial damage to the houses and other properties of the villagers. Learned Counsel for the petitioner referred to an inspection report, which is signed by the officers and employees of Public Works Department/PMGSY, in support of his contention that the department also admits that the property of certain villagers were

substantially damaged.

(3) Grievance raised by the petitioner is that despite repeated representations, no compensation has been paid to the affected villagers. One such representation submitted by the petitioner to the District Magistrate is on record as Annexure-6 to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top