HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHAN PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
S N L o . .
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPMS 2939/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Rajedra Arya, Advocate, for
the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing
Counsel, for the State.
Mr. S.S. Chauhan, Advocate, for
the respondent no. 2 and 3.
(2) Petitioner is resident of Village Ala, Tehsil Ghat, District Chamoli. According to him, Public Works Department constructed Ramni-Peri Motor Road and during hill cutting, debris had fallen on rivulets and water channels, due to which they changed their course and caused substantial damage to the houses and other properties of the villagers. Learned Counsel for the petitioner referred to an inspection report, which is signed by the officers and employees of Public Works Department/PMGSY, in support of his contention that the department also admits that the property of certain villagers were
substantially damaged.
(3) Grievance raised by the petitioner is that despite repeated representations, no compensation has been paid to the affected villagers. One such representation submitted by the petitioner to the District Magistrate is on record as Annexure-6 to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.