HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
GAURAV CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT MAGISTRATE PAURI GARHWAL – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPMS/ 3008/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Sumit Joshi, learned counsel for
the petitioner.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing
Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, learned
counsel for the respondent-Bank.
4. Petitioner took a loan of ₹9,50,000/- from Bank of India, Branch Kotdwar under Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme. Since there was a default in repayment of loan, therefore, a recovery certificate was issued by the Bank. Tehsildar, Kotdwar has issued a citation for recovery of ₹5,63,113/- plus other expenses. Thus, feeling aggrieved,
petitioner has approached this Court.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner’s father suffered serious burn injuries in which one of his hands was also amputated and due to expenses incurred in the treatment of his father, petitioner was unable to service the loan. He submits that default in payment is not deliberate but owing to circumstances, wholly beyond his
control.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is a law-abiding citizen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.