SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972295

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AYYUB – Appellant
Versus
AKHTARI BEGUM – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition Misc. Single No.3015 of 2025

30th October, 2025

Ayyub and others …………Petitioners

Versus

Akhtari Begum …………Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Ravi Bisht, Advocate for the petitioners.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

The present writ petition has been filed under

Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners seeking quashing of the impugned order dated 16.04.2025, passed by the learned Deputy Director of Consolidation/Collector, Haridwar, in Revision No.16/2018-19, under Section 48(1) of the U.P. Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1953, Akhtari Begum Vs.

Ayyub and Others.

2. The facts in brief are that the dispute arises out of a property bearing Gata Nos. 963A and 963B situated at Village Badheri, Rajputan, Pargana and Tehsil Roorkee, District Haridwar. The petitioners, who are members of the same family, had instituted a case before the IVth Consolidation Officer, Roorkee, under Section 9(a)(2) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act, contending that their father had never sold the aforesaid property to the res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top