SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972298

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KMALESH PALIWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPCRL No. 1330 of 2025

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J .

Mr. Rahul Adhikari, learned counsel for

the Petitioner.

2. Mr. Rakesh Negi, learned Brief Holder for

the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Rahul Bhatt, learned counsel for the

Respondent No.3.

4. The present Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner against the Respondents, particularly Respondent No. 3

with the following prayer:

“(i)Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari and quash the impugned FIR No. 185 of 2023 dated 14.07.2023 U/s 420 of IPC, registered at, Police Station

Mukhani, District Nainital

(ii) issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2 do not arrest the Petitioner in connection with the impugned FIR No. 185 of 2023 dated 14.07.2023 U/s 420 of IPC, registered at, Police Station Mukhani, District Nainital,on the basis of compromise arrived between the parties, qua the present

Petitioner.”

5. Today, the matter is listed for disposal of the Compounding Application (IA No. 01

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top