HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MAHIPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
S
reports, orders
L
or proceedings
.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
N
and Registrar’s
o
order with
.
Signatures
30.10.2025 ABA No.1190 of 2025
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.
The present Application has been
filed by the applicant-Mahipal for anticipatory bail in the Complaint Case No.39 of 2025, “Baleshwar Vs. Mahipal”, pending before the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar under Sections 323, 452, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,
1989.
2. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate assisted by Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for
respondent no.1.
3. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate, submitted that the trial court has fixed 12.11.2025. He has requested on instructions to permit the applicant- Mahipal to withdraw the present
Haridwar. He has requested to direct the decide the anticipatory bail application of the applicant, who will file the said application on 31.10.2025, before
12.11.2025.
4. The said request has not been opposed by the respondent no.1.
5. The present Anticipato
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.