SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972302

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MAHIPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

S

reports, orders

L

or proceedings

.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

N

and Registrar’s

o

order with

.

Signatures

30.10.2025 ABA No.1190 of 2025

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma, J.

The present Application has been

filed by the applicant-Mahipal for anticipatory bail in the Complaint Case No.39 of 2025, “Baleshwar Vs. Mahipal”, pending before the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Haridwar under Sections 323, 452, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 3(1)(X) of the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act,

1989.

2. Heard Mr. Parikshit Saini, learned counsel for applicant and Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate assisted by Mrs. Sweta Badola Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for

respondent no.1.

3. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate, submitted that the trial court has fixed 12.11.2025. He has requested on instructions to permit the applicant- Mahipal to withdraw the present

Haridwar. He has requested to direct the decide the anticipatory bail application of the applicant, who will file the said application on 31.10.2025, before

12.11.2025.

4. The said request has not been opposed by the respondent no.1.

5. The present Anticipato

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top