SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972330

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SMT. SIMARJEET – Appellant
Versus
IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

A.O. No. 82 of 2019

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Mayank Pandey, learned counsel for

the appellant/applicant.

2. Mr. Pramod Kumar Bailwal, learned counsel for respondent no.1/Insurance

Company.

3. A review application (MCC No. 1 of 2025) has been filed by the appellant/applicant seeking review of the order dated 06.11.2025 passed by this Court, whereby the appeal filed by the appellant was disposed of with certain

modifications to the award.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant/applicant would submit that certain aspects of the order dated 06.11.2025 require reconsideration and, therefore, prays for review

of the said order.

5. Per contra, learned counsel for respondent no.1/Insurance Company raises a preliminary objection to the very maintainability of the review application on the ground that the power of review is purely statutory and cannot be exercised unless specifically provided under the governing enactment. Since the Act under which the appeal was decided contains no provision conferring review jurisdiction, the present application is stated to be misconceive

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top