SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972335

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DEEPAK DOGRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPMS 3071/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Pankaj Singh Chauhan,

Advocate, for the petitioner.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing

Counsel, for the State.

(2) Assistant Engineer (First), Construction Division, PWD, Haldwani has issued a notice to petitioner on 9.10.2025, whereby petitioner has been asked to remove his encroachment over roadside land within seven days. Petitioner contends that he had submitted reply to the earlier notice dated 16.6.2025, but the same was not considered and petitioner has been simply asked to remove encroachment, while petitioner has not made any

encroachment over public land.

(3) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of old and new khatauni was also enclosed with petitioner’s representation, therefore it was incumbent upon the concerned authority of Public Works Department to consider all relevant

aspects.

(4) Learned State Counsel submits that the writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the competent authority in Public Works Department to pass order afresh after considering the reply submitted (5) Pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top