HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DEEPAK DOGRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPMS 3071 / 2025
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
S N L o . .
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPMS 3071/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Pankaj Singh Chauhan,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing
Counsel, for the State.
(2) Assistant Engineer (First), Construction Division, PWD, Haldwani has issued a notice to petitioner on 9.10.2025, whereby petitioner has been asked to remove his encroachment over roadside land within seven days. Petitioner contends that he had submitted reply to the earlier notice dated 16.6.2025, but the same was not considered and petitioner has been simply asked to remove encroachment, while petitioner has not made any
encroachment over public land.
(3) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of old and new khatauni was also enclosed with petitioner’s representation, therefore it was incumbent upon the concerned authority of Public Works Department to consider all relevant
aspects.
(4) Learned State Counsel submits that the writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the competent authority in Public Works Department to pass order afresh after considering the reply submitted (5) Perusal of the impugned notice dated 9.10.2025 does not reflect consideration of petitioner’s reply by the competent authority. Since valuable property right of the petitioner is involved,
therefore, direction to remove encroachment can be issued only after arriving at the satisfaction that petitioner has encroached upon public land.
(6) Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with a direction to Assistant Engineer (First), Construction Division, PWD, Haldwani to take decision in the matter afresh, after considering petitioner’s reply dated 3.7.2025, Annexure-3 to the writ petition. This Court hopes and expects that Assistant Engineer concerned shall take decision in the matter as early as possible but not later than six weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. For a period of six weeks or till decision is taken in the matter, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
6.11.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMAR D2pCDe.o9 iN a5rg 1sti:4et tca: a 52N =l2 lC70Iu0 yNoBm s,Ed3iobega.10n ,Hr8e c260 Id nGa6 bDP yC8 CR P : OA90,R5sBUAtOE=Bf8T 3 OU9DHT+ D10 FH KCAa5 U K9R'3 TM6U5MKEHR A17 R4NB3 K9aDH4f,80NE2FD1Dc, 5o08u6=H2AIfGCe aC1OA4UBR56T81 aOf03F52UeDTFb6A1R9C8AdK54H86C2N5D073F,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.