HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DEEPAK DOGRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
S N L o . .
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPMS 3071/ 2025
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Pankaj Singh Chauhan,
Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing
Counsel, for the State.
(2) Assistant Engineer (First), Construction Division, PWD, Haldwani has issued a notice to petitioner on 9.10.2025, whereby petitioner has been asked to remove his encroachment over roadside land within seven days. Petitioner contends that he had submitted reply to the earlier notice dated 16.6.2025, but the same was not considered and petitioner has been simply asked to remove encroachment, while petitioner has not made any
encroachment over public land.
(3) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that copy of old and new khatauni was also enclosed with petitioner’s representation, therefore it was incumbent upon the concerned authority of Public Works Department to consider all relevant
aspects.
(4) Learned State Counsel submits that the writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to the competent authority in Public Works Department to pass order afresh after considering the reply submitted (5) Pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.