Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS/ 82/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Devesh Upreti, learned counsel

for the petitioner.

2. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned Additional C.S.C. for the State of

Uttarakhand.

3. Petitioner was appointed as Teacher in a Government Aided School and he retired from the post of Assistant Teacher - L.T. Grade (Biology) on 31.05.2023. According to him, he was not paid any

amount as Pension or Gratuity.

4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following

reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature

of Mandamus Commanding the respondent no. 3 to give the benefit of order dated 07.12.2018 (Annexure No. 14), passed by this Hon’ble Court in WPSS No. 524/2024 (S/S), so far as it relates to quashing of order dated 27.06.2013 (passed by respondent no. 3) and accordingly, enter the date of regularization of petitioner as 27.01.2005 in the service book of petitioner.

(ii) Issue a writ order or direction of Mandamus

commanding the respondent no. 1 to 4 to give the benefits of Old Pension Scheme to the petitioner from the date of his retirement (31.05.2023), counting his services from 01.02.1993 by treating the date of regularization of services of

petitioner w.e.f. 27.01.2005.

(iii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature

of Certiorari by quashing the Order/Letter No. 06/Asha. Maa./7527-29/2023-24, dated

07.11.2024 (Annexure No. 19), issued by respondent no. 4, so far it relates to preparation of documents of petitioner for granting him the benefit of new pension scheme.

5. Learned State Counsel was asked to get instructions in the matter, as to whether petitioner’s case is covered by judgment dated 07.12.2018 rendered in WPSS No. 524 of 2014.

6. Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisht, learned State Counsel has produced in Court written instructions received by him from the Office of Additional Director of Education, Pauri, which is taken on record. The same shall be paginated by the Registry.

7. Based on written instructions, learned State Counsel submits that petitioner’s case is covered by judgment dated 07.12.2018 rendered in WPSS No. 524 of 2014, therefore, he has no objection if writ petition is decided in terms of the said judgment.

8. In view of concession recorded by learned State Counsel, the writ petition is decided in terms of judgment dated 07.12.2018 rendered in WPSS No. 524 of

2014.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)

06.11.2025 Aswal N SI I N T G I R H A A J SWAL DU28s4De.d6 TiN a 5r g 1ti :4ae 3Atc l: a C62N =Rl 90I u yN5F=mK E1 s,eio bag . A 8 =cn A NH r e =36DIdG0748 ,f b5H E y ,C eB1p N : O 7o I7T 20 Us86t a R Bl1A FC eO -0 J o9FS d8 3, I ' UN c7=fn TG 28H 69N A3R CIT4S BfW K 60R1H F7,A s4J L t N =SCI DU2NT, G o5EH uAa3 =RD8H 2S5KI 6W GfHF9H8AL C0CN 2ODaU,3 R A0T C8 O Fb4 F0