SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972338

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MUNAWAR JAHAN – Appellant
Versus
GOVIND BALLABH PANT AGRICULTURE AND TECHNOLOGY UNIVERSITY – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS No. 2525 of 2024

With

WPSS No. 419 of 2023 WPSS No. 522 of 2023

WPSS No. 2191 of 2023 WPSS No. 2342 of 2023

WPSS No. 189 of 2024 WPSS No. 874 of 2024

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi & Mr. Suhal A.

Siddiqui, Advocates for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Ganesh Kandpal, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of

Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Shubhang Dobhal & Mr. S.S. Lingwal, Advocates for the respondent-

University.

4. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPSS No. 2525 of 2024 alone are being

considered and discussed.

5. Petitioner was a non-teaching employee of Govind Ballabh Pant Agriculture and Technology University, who retired from the post of Junior Engineer, on 31.01.2002; gratuity has been denied to him only on the ground that he had opted to retire at the age of

60 years.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although initially, there were two categories of em

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top