SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972344

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MARGRATE A CHAND – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS 2227/ 2024

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate, for the

petitioner.

Mr. Ganesh Datt Kandpal, Deputy

AG, for the State.

Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate,

i/b Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the

respondent no. 3.

Mr. Atul Bahuguna, Advocate, for

the respondent no. 4.

(2) Petitioner responded to an advertisement dated 11.3.2024, issued by Uttarakhand Medical Service Selection Board inviting applications for the post of Nursing Officer, Male/Female. One of the conditions mentioned in the advertisement at clause 6 was that every candidate must be registered with Uttarakhand Nurses and Midwives Council. Petitioner responded to the said advertisement and she participated in the selection process, but during document verification, it was found that validity period of petitioner’s registration with Uttarakhand Nurses and Midwives Council expired on 23.4.2020. On this ground alone, petitioner was declared to be ineligible. Thus feeling aggrieved, petitioner has approached this

Court.

(3) Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top