SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972345

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
IRENE ROBERTS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

S N L o . .

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS 2331/ 2024 WPSS 2249/ 2024 WPSS 2283/ 2024

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Vinay Kumar, Mr. Anand Singh

and Mr. Ravendra Singh Bisht, Counsel for

the petitioners.

Mr. Ganesh Datt Kandpal, Deputy

AG, for the State.

Mr. Rakshit Srivastava, Advocate,

i/b Mr. Ramji Srivastava, Advocate for the

respondent no. 3.

Mr. Atul Bahuguna, Advocate, for

the respondent no. 4.

(2) Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these writ petitions, therefore, these are being heard and decided together by this common judgment. However, for brevity, facts of Writ Petition (S/S) No. 2331 of 2024 alone

are being considered and discussed here.

(3) Uttarakhand Medical Service Selection Board issued an advertisement on 11.3.2024, inviting applications against 1455 vacancies on the post of Nursing Officer in different government medical colleges/State Cancer Institute. Clause 6 of the said advertisement required that every candidate must be registered with Uttarakhand Nurses and Midwives Council on the last date of submission of application. Petitioner responded to the ad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top