SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 37

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPMS 754 / 2025



Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings or

SL. No. Date directions and COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

Registrar’s order with Signatures

WPMS/ 754/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Ms. Mamta Bisht, Advocate for the

petitioner.

Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the

State.

Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate assisted by

Mr. Mohd. Shafy, Advocate for the

respondents/Waqf Board.

2. Petitioner has challenged order passed by Uttarakhand Waqf Board on 21.02.2025. By the said order, a Committee of Management for managing affairs of Waqf No. 130 was constituted

by the Uttarakhand Waqf Board.

3. Petitioner has challenged the said order on the ground that earlier committee of management which was in place was not given opportunity of

hearing.

4. Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Uttarakhand Waqf Board; however, submits that term of the petitioner had expired long back in 2020 and thereafter, vide order dated 06.02.2023, petitioner was allowed to manage the affairs of the waqf only till constitution of another

committee.

5. He submits that since new committee has been constituted by Uttarakhand Waqf Board by order dated 21.02.2025, therefore the term of the

petitioner automatically came to an end and no further hearing was needed, while constituting fresh committee of management.

6. Mr. T.A. Khan, Senior Advocate further submits that interim relief application filed by the petitioner before Waqf Tribunal was not being heard, therefore petitioner approached this Court and coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 03.04.2025 passed in this writ petition has rejected the prayer for interim relief made by petitioner.

7. He further submits that since the Waqf Petition filed by petitioner is pending before the Tribunal, therefore petitioner should be relegated to the Waqf Tribunal which will decide all the issues raised by petitioner.

8. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Qorum of the Waqf Tribunal is not complete, therefore the Waqf Tribunal is adjourning the matter and no hearing is taking place.

9. Mr. T.A. Khan, learned Senior Counsel for the Waqf Board has drawn attention of this Court to Rule 67 (10) Uttarakhand Waqf Rules, 2017, notified on 28.11.2017, which reads as under: “67. Other procedure to be followed by Tribunal –

(10). Final hearing of any matter shall take place before the full bench:

Provided that matters other than final hearing may be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top