SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 97

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NASREEN SANGA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or

S N L o . Date p d r ir o e c c e t e i d on in s g a s n o d r COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

Registrar’s order with Signatures

CRLR No.41 of 2026

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Ms. Sheetal Selwal, Advocate for the revisionist.

2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.

Delay Condonation Application (IA No.2 of 2026)

3. There is a delay of 41 days in filing the present

criminal revision.

4. Learned counsel for the State does not want to file any

objection to the delay condonation application.

5. Having gone through the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application, a case is made out in

favour of the revisionist to condone the delay.

6. Delay of 41 days in filing the criminal revision is

hereby condoned.

7. Accordingly delay condonation application is allowed.

Exemption Application (IA No.1 of 2026)

8. An exemption application has been filed by the revisionist for exempting her to surrender before the trial court only on the ground of her age i.e., 86 years and

ailment and that she is bed ridden.

9. The ground taken by the counsel for the revisionist in the exemption application appears to be sound, therefore,

exemption application is allowed.

CRLR No.41 of 2026

1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top