HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NASREEN SANGA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
S N L o . Date p d r ir o e c c e t e i d on in s g a s n o d r COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
Registrar’s order with Signatures
CRLR No.41 of 2026
Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Ms. Sheetal Selwal, Advocate for the revisionist.
2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, A.G.A. for the State.
Delay Condonation Application (IA No.2 of 2026)
3. There is a delay of 41 days in filing the present
criminal revision.
4. Learned counsel for the State does not want to file any
objection to the delay condonation application.
5. Having gone through the affidavit filed in support of the delay condonation application, a case is made out in
favour of the revisionist to condone the delay.
6. Delay of 41 days in filing the criminal revision is
hereby condoned.
7. Accordingly delay condonation application is allowed.
Exemption Application (IA No.1 of 2026)
8. An exemption application has been filed by the revisionist for exempting her to surrender before the trial court only on the ground of her age i.e., 86 years and
ailment and that she is bed ridden.
9. The ground taken by the counsel for the revisionist in the exemption application appears to be sound, therefore,
exemption application is allowed.
CRLR No.41 of 2026
1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.