SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 128

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHYAM MANOHAR ALIAS SHYAMLAL – Appellant
Versus
MAHESH GANDHI – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition Misc. Single No.6 of 2026

09th January, 2026

Shyam Manohar alias Shyamlal ……….Petitioner

Versus

Mahesh Gandhi and others ………..Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Sameer Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

This writ petition has been filed under Article

227 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner– defendant no.1 seeks issuance of a direction to the learned trial court, i.e., Civil Judge (J.D.), Haridwar, to hear and decide the temporary injunction application as well as the application for appointment of a receiver, Paper No.31A1, under Order XL Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, within a stipulated

time to be fixed by this Court.

2. The case of the petitioner–defendant no.1, as unfolded from the present writ petition, is that an original suit for partition was filed by respondent–plaintiff no.1, Mahesh Gandhi, against the petitioner–defendant no.1 before the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Haridwar. In the said suit, an application for temporary injunc

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top