HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHYAM MANOHAR ALIAS SHYAMLAL – Appellant
Versus
MAHESH GANDHI – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition Misc. Single No.6 of 2026
09th January, 2026
Shyam Manohar alias Shyamlal ……….Petitioner
Versus
Mahesh Gandhi and others ………..Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Sameer Rawat, Advocate for the petitioner.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
This writ petition has been filed under Article
227 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner– defendant no.1 seeks issuance of a direction to the learned trial court, i.e., Civil Judge (J.D.), Haridwar, to hear and decide the temporary injunction application as well as the application for appointment of a receiver, Paper No.31A1, under Order XL Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, within a stipulated
time to be fixed by this Court.
2. The case of the petitioner–defendant no.1, as unfolded from the present writ petition, is that an original suit for partition was filed by respondent–plaintiff no.1, Mahesh Gandhi, against the petitioner–defendant no.1 before the learned Civil Judge (J.D.), Haridwar. In the said suit, an application for temporary injunc
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.