HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY – Appellant
Versus
RAJAT BHARDWAJ – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions and COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
No
Registrar’s order with
Signatures
SPA No. 101 of 2025
Hon’ble G. Narendar, C.J.
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Shashank Upadhyaya, learned
counsel for the appellant.
Mr. Ramji Srivastava, learned counsel for
respondent nos. 1 to 4.
Mr. Vinay Kumar, learned counsel for
respondent no. 5.
2. Heard the learned counsel for both sides. 3. This Court, while staying the order of the learned Single Judge dated 12.12.2024 was pleased to observe in paragraph no.5 of the
order as under:-
“In that view, there shall be a stay of operation and execution of the impugned order dated 12.12.2024. The present round of litigation will not come in the way of the respondents-petitioners participating in any further round of selection process that may
be announced.”
4. It is now submitted that further the recruitment process has not been taken
forward in view of the interim order.
5. This Court, while granting the interim order, had in fact granted leave to the respondents-petitioners to participate in any further round of selection process, indicating thereby that this Court was not staying any selection process that may be comm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.