HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHOBHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR DIRECTOREATE OF TREASURY PENSION AND ENTITLEMENT – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPMS/ 52/ 2026
Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.
1. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel with Mr. Akshit Gururani, learned counsel
for the petitioners.
2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for respondent
no. 1.
3. Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for respondent
no. 2.
4. Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, learned counsel
accepts notice for respondent no. 3.
5. By the instant petition the petitioner is praying for the following
relief:-
To issue a writ order or direction in
the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to forthwith sanction the family pension to the petitioner and to regularly
disburse the same.
6. On the previous date Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. was directed to get instructions from respondent no. 2. Today, Mr. I.D. Paliwal, on written instructions of the Director apprise to this Court that the family pension has already been sanctioned to the petitioner by the Joint Director (Pension) and the communication thereof was also sent to the Chief/Senior Treasury Officer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.