SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 177

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SHOBHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR DIRECTOREATE OF TREASURY PENSION AND ENTITLEMENT – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPMS/ 52/ 2026

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel with Mr. Akshit Gururani, learned counsel

for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for respondent

no. 1.

3. Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice for respondent

no. 2.

4. Ms. Pushpa Bhatt, learned counsel

accepts notice for respondent no. 3.

5. By the instant petition the petitioner is praying for the following

relief:-

To issue a writ order or direction in

the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondent authorities to forthwith sanction the family pension to the petitioner and to regularly

disburse the same.

6. On the previous date Mr. I.D. Paliwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. was directed to get instructions from respondent no. 2. Today, Mr. I.D. Paliwal, on written instructions of the Director apprise to this Court that the family pension has already been sanctioned to the petitioner by the Joint Director (Pension) and the communication thereof was also sent to the Chief/Senior Treasury Officer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top