SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 187

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHD SAIM AHMAD ALIAS SHAMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPCRL 31 / 2026



Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL. Dat

No. e an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

order with Signatures

WPCRL No. 31 of 2026

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2. Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General assisted by Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State

of Uttarakhand.

3. The present Criminal Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted with the

following prayers:

“(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned FIR dated 01.01.2026 registered as Case Crime No. 0001 of 2026 under Section 2 (b)(xi) read with Section 3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station

Buggawala District Haridwar.

(ii)Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to arrest the petitioner in Case Crime No. 0001 of 2026 under Section 2 (b)(xi) read with Section 3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 Police Station Buggawala District Haridwar till the pendency of present

Petition.”

4. The Petitioner has also filed a Stay Application (I.A. No. 01 of 2026), seeking a stay of his arrest in pursuance of the Case Crime No. 0001 of 2026, for the offence punishable under Section 2 (b)(xi) read with Section 3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police

Station Buggawala District Haridwar.

5. Admit.

6. Let objections be filed by the Respondents.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as an interim measure, it is directed that till the next date of listing, no coercive measures shall be taken against the Petitioner, subject to the condition that the Petitioner shall cooperate with the

investigation. In the event of non-cooperation, the interim protection so granted shall stand automatically vacated.

8. The Stay Application stands disposed of accordingly.

9. List this case on 27.03.2026.

(Ashish Naithani, J.)

07.01.2026 Shiksha

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top