HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SURESH RATHORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL. Dat
No. e an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
order with Signatures
WPCRL No. 13 of 2026
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsels for the
Petitioner.
2. Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned G.A. assisted by Mr. Kuldeep Rawat, learned A.G.A and Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State of
Uttarakhand.
3. The present Criminal Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted with the following
prayers:
“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the First Information Report lodged by respondent no. 4 registered as FIR No. 534 of 2025 dated 24.12.2025 U/s 248(b), 3(5) and 336(4) of B.N.S, 2023 at P.S. Bahadrabad,
District Haridwar.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 and 3 not to arrest the Petitioner in pursuance to the First Information Report lodged by respondent no. 4 registered as FIR No. 534 of 2025 dated 24.12.2025 U/s 248(b), 3(5) and 336(4) of B.N.S, 2023 at P.S.
Bahadrabad, District Haridwar.”
4. The Petitioner has also filed an Interim Relief Application (I.A
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.