SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 202

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SURESH RATHORE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL. Dat

No. e an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

order with Signatures

WPCRL No. 13 of 2026

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Vaibhav Singh Chauhan, learned counsels for the

Petitioner.

2. Mr. Amit Bhatt, learned G.A. assisted by Mr. Kuldeep Rawat, learned A.G.A and Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State of

Uttarakhand.

3. The present Criminal Writ Petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been instituted with the following

prayers:

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the First Information Report lodged by respondent no. 4 registered as FIR No. 534 of 2025 dated 24.12.2025 U/s 248(b), 3(5) and 336(4) of B.N.S, 2023 at P.S. Bahadrabad,

District Haridwar.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent No. 2 and 3 not to arrest the Petitioner in pursuance to the First Information Report lodged by respondent no. 4 registered as FIR No. 534 of 2025 dated 24.12.2025 U/s 248(b), 3(5) and 336(4) of B.N.S, 2023 at P.S.

Bahadrabad, District Haridwar.”

4. The Petitioner has also filed an Interim Relief Application (I.A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top