HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NAVEEN PARIHAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL
THE HON’BLE CHI EF JUSTI CE MR. G. NARENDAR
AND
THE HON’BLE JUSTI CE MR. SUBHASH UPADHYAY
Anticipatory Bail Application.301 of 2025
30th December, 2025
Naveen Parihar --Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand --Respondent --------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. Arvind Vashistha, learned Senior Counsel (through V.C.) assisted by Mr. Gaurav Singh (through V.C.) and Mr. Siddhant Tiwrai, learned
counsel for the applicant.
Mr. J. S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General along with Mr. Rakesh
Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State of Uttarakhand.
--------------------------------------------------------------
JUDGMENT : (per Mr. G. Narendar C. J.
Heard learned Senior Counsel for the applicant
and learned Deputy Advocate General for the State.
2. The brief facts of the case are that on 06.01.2025 Co-ordinate Bench of this Court had directed the stoppage of all mining activities in Bageshwar District after taking note of the precarious
situation created by the mining activities.
3. The instant petitioner was an intervening applicant in IA No.15 of 2025 in the said Suo Motu PIL registered by this Court as WPPIL No.174 of 202
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.