HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HATTAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
SL reports, orders or
. proceedings or
Date COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
N directions and o. Registrar’s order
with Signatures
WPCRL No. 1715 of 2025
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, learned counsel for the
Petitioners appeared through V.C.
2. Mr. S. S. Chauhan, learned D.A.G. assisted by
Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioners for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 13.12.2025, bearing FIR No.1287 of 2025, under Section 121(1), 132, 281 & 352 of BNS registered at Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar and further to direct the Respondent nos. 1 & 2 not to arrest the Petitioners in
connection with the abovementioned FIR.
4. During the arguments, the learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar/Respondent no.2 to follow the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, passed in ‘Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another’, (2014) 8 SCC 273,
before proceed to arrest the Petitioners.
5. Learned State counsel has no objection on the su
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.