SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972426

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HATTAM SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

SL reports, orders or

. proceedings or

Date COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

N directions and o. Registrar’s order

with Signatures

WPCRL No. 1715 of 2025

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Mohd. Alauddin, learned counsel for the

Petitioners appeared through V.C.

2. Mr. S. S. Chauhan, learned D.A.G. assisted by

Mr. Vikash Uniyal, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioners for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 13.12.2025, bearing FIR No.1287 of 2025, under Section 121(1), 132, 281 & 352 of BNS registered at Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar and further to direct the Respondent nos. 1 & 2 not to arrest the Petitioners in

connection with the abovementioned FIR.

4. During the arguments, the learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the Station House Officer, Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar/Respondent no.2 to follow the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court, passed inArnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and Another’, (2014) 8 SCC 273,

before proceed to arrest the Petitioners.

5. Learned State counsel has no objection on the su

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top