SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 307

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHAN LAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL. Dat or directions

No. e and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures 2026:UHC:547

ABA No.17 of 2026

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Mohd Safdar, learned counsel for the Applicant.

2. Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned Brief Holder, for the State of

Uttarakhand.

3. Applicant seeks anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.547 of 2025, under Section 8 read with Section 21 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, 1985, at Police Station

Kotwali Manglaur, District Haridwar.

4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

record.

5. Learned State Counsel has vehemently opposed the

anticipatory bail application.

6. Having considered the entirety of the facts, this Court is of

the view that this is a case fit for anticipatory bail.

7. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.

8. In that eventuality of arrest, the Applicant shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail subject to his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the Applicant shall also

comply with the following conditions:-

“(i). The Applicant shall co-operate with the

in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top