HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SUKHPAL SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
ABA 8 / 2026
COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL. Dat or directions
No. e and Registrar’s
order with
Signatures 2026:UHC:526
ABA No.08 of 2026
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the Applicants.
2. Mr. J.S. Virk, learned D.A.G. assisted by Mr. Rakesh
Kumar Joshi, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, learned counsel for the
informant.
4. Applicants – Sukhpal Singh and Smt. Gurmeet Kaur, seek anticipatory bail in FIR No.338 of 2015, dated 26.12.2015, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of IPC, at Police Station
Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the
record.
6. Learned counsel for the Applicants submits that the Applicants are innocent person and have committed no crime as alleged by the prosecution, and they have falsely been implicated in the alleged commission of crime without any proper inquiry or
investigation.
7. There is objection on behalf of the learned counsel for the informant with the contention that the present relief is being availed parallelly to the one placed before the learned Sessions
Court concerned.
8. To which, learned counsel for the Applicants makes a submission that there is no such application pending before the
learned Sessions Court.
9. Learned State Counsel has vehemently opposed the
anticipatory bail application.
10. Having considered the entirety of the facts, this Court is of
the view that this is a case fit for anticipatory bail.
11. The anticipatory bail application is allowed.
12. In that eventuality of arrest, the Applicants shall be enlarged on anticipatory bail subject to their furnishing a personal bond with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer (“AO”). In addition to it, the Applicants shall also comply with the following conditions:-
“(i). The Applicants shall co-operate with the investigation.
(ii). The Applicants shall not approach any witness in any manner, whatsoever.
(iii). The Applicants shall not leave the country without prior permission of the concerned court.
(iv). The Applicants shall deposit their passport with the AO. The passport may only be returned by the order of the court concerned. In case, the Applicants do not have passport, they shall given an undertaking to that effect to the AO.
(v). The Applicants shall also give an undertaking on (i), (ii) & (iii) above.
(Ashish Naithani, J.)
Vacation Judge
13.01.2026 Nitesh/
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.