SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 320

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SAHAB SINGH ALIAS SABI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
BA1 1962 / 2025



Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

BA1 No. 1962 of 2025

Hon'ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Mr. Abhishek Verma, learned

counsel for the applicant.

2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Himanshu

Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State.

3. Present applicant Sahab Singh @ Sabi, S/o Jaswant Singh is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 13.10.2024, bearing FIR/Case Crime No. 231 of 2024, registered at P.S. Dineshpur District U.S. Nagar wherein the present applicant has been implicated for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 115(2), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(2), 352 of BNS

2023.

4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that on 16.09.2025 PW1, on 05.12.2025 PW2 (injured witness) and on 03.01.2026 PW3 (injured witness) were examined and all of them have been declared hostile. It is argued that there is a cross version of the incident regarding which an FIR was lodged on 13.10.2025 at 8:31 am and in the said FIR all the accused persons have been enlarged on bail the copy of which has been enclosed in this bail application. He further submits that the applicant is

languishing in jail since 31.12.2024.

5. On the other side, Mr. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State has not disputed this fact PW1, PW2 (injured witness) and PW3 (injured witness) have been declared hostile and also has not disputed that in the cross FIR the accused persons have been

enlarged on bail.

6. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and

taking into consideration that PW1, PW2 (injured witness) and PW3 (injured witness)have been declared hostile and in the cross FIR the accused persons have been enlarged on bail, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail.

7. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed.

8. Let the applicant Sahab Singh @ Sabi be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

10. It is made clear that after being released on bail the applicant shall join the trial court proceedings on each and every date and will not seek unnecessary adjournment and will ensure his presence on the first day of every month in the nearest police station and the concerned S.H.O. shall record his presence failing which the concerned S.H.O. immediately apprise to the Trial Court.

(Rakesh Thapliyal, J.)

10.01.2026 Parul

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top