7. So far as Applicant Irshad is concerned, the present application is his second bail application (Bail Application No. 134 of 2025). His earlier bail application was rejected by this Court. Learned counsel for the Applicant has not been able to point out any new fact, circumstance, or subsequent development which may warrant reconsideration of the prayer for bail. In the absence of any fresh ground, the second bail application is not maintainable and is liable to be rejected.

8. With respect to Applicant Saif Ali (Bail Application No.799 of 2025), this is his first regular bail application, though he was earlier granted anticipatory bail. However, from a perusal of the recovery memo, it is prima facie reflected that the firearm allegedly used in the commission of the offence, along with cartridges, cash and other stolen articles, have been recovered during investigation. The factum and nature of recovery are inferable from the recovery memo placed on record.

9. The allegations disclose a grave and heinous offence involving house-trespass by night, use of a firearm, intimidation of a woman inside her dwelling house, and commission of robbery. The manner of occurrence, the recovery o