SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 335

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJNEESH KUMAR SAINI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Anticipatory Bail Application No.22 of 2026

Rajneesh Kumar Saini --Applicant

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand --Respondent ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for applicant.

Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

The present Application under Section 482 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR/Case Crime No.0349 of 2025 dated 24.12.2025, registered with Police Station Vikas Nagar, District Dehradun, for offences

punishable under Sections 108 and 351(3) of B.N.S., 2023.

2. As per the prosecution case, the FIR was lodged on 24.12.2025 against seven accused persons including present applicant under the aforementioned Sections alleging therein that the informant’s brother committed suicide on 22.12.2025 and he demanded strict legal action against the individuals named in the suicide note written by

deceased.

3. Heard Mr. Dharmendra Barthwal, learned counsel for the Applicant and Mr. Pankaj Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand and perused the reco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top