SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 972445

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ANOOP AGRAWAL AND ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Judgment Reserved on: 20.11.2025

Judgment Pronounced on:23.12.2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (Criminal) No.812 of 2024

Anoop Agrawal and Ors ......Petitioners

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and Ors. …..Respondents

Presence

Mr. P.N. Mishra, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Aditya Singh, Mr. Alok Kumar Pandey, Mr. Aakash Sanyal, learned counsel for the

Petitioners.

Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand.

Mr. Piyush Garg, Ms. Priyanka Agarwal, learned counsel for the

Respondent.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

1. The present writ petition has been instituted by the Petitioners under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 20.09.2022 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kashipur, District Udham Singh Nagar, in Miscellaneous Application No. 630 of 2021, whereby an application moved by Respondent No. 3 under Section 156(3) CrPC was allowed, leading to registration of FIR No. 0601 of 2022 dated 23.09.2022 at Police Station Kashipur for offences under Sections

420, 467, 468 and 471 IPC.

2. The genesis of the dispute lies in eleven registered sale deeds

executed between the years 1997 and 2009 by l

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top