SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(Online)(UK) 2

MAHAVIR PRASAD BAHUGUNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Advocates:
['RAJ KUMAR SINGH', '', 'RADHA ARYA', 'G A']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No. 362 of 2019

Mahavir Prasad Bahuguna

….Revisionist

Versus

State of Uttarakhand

....Respondent

Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate for the revisionist.

Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, DAG for the State.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Instant revision has been preferred against the judgment

and order dated 22.11.2018, passed in Criminal Case No. 2455 of

2003, State Vs. Mahavir Prasad Bahuguna, by the court of learned

Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun (for short “the case”). By this

judgment and order, the revisionist has been convicted under

Sections 324, 354 and 506 IPC and sentenced as hereunder:-

1. Under Section 324 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of

two years and a fine of Rs.10,000/-.

2. Under Section 354 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of

one year and a fine of Rs.5,000/-.

3. Under Section 506 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of

six months.

There are directions for further imprisonment, in case default of

payment of fine is made”.

This judgment and order dated 22.11.2018 was

challenged by the re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top