MAHAVIR PRASAD BAHUGUNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Criminal Revision No. 362 of 2019
Mahavir Prasad Bahuguna
….Revisionist
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
....Respondent
Mr. Raj Kumar Singh, Advocate for the revisionist.
Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, DAG for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Instant revision has been preferred against the judgment
and order dated 22.11.2018, passed in Criminal Case No. 2455 of
2003, State Vs. Mahavir Prasad Bahuguna, by the court of learned
Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun (for short “the case”). By this
judgment and order, the revisionist has been convicted under
Sections 324, 354 and 506 IPC and sentenced as hereunder:-
“1. Under Section 324 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of
two years and a fine of Rs.10,000/-.
2. Under Section 354 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of
one year and a fine of Rs.5,000/-.
3. Under Section 506 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of
six months.
There are directions for further imprisonment, in case default of
payment of fine is made”.
This judgment and order dated 22.11.2018 was
challenged by the re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.