HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
GULISTA – Appellant
Versus
JAMSHED – Respondent
Reserved
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
First Appeal No. 105 of 2012
Gulista
.…… Appellant
Versus
Jamshed
……. Respondent
Present: Mr. Nagesh Aggarwal, Advocate for the appellant.
Mr. Bilal Ahmed, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Mohd.
Safdar, Advocate for the respondent.
Coram:- Hon’ble Rajiv Sharma, J.
Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
Reserved on: 14.06.2017
Delivered on: 07.10.2017
Per - Hon’ble Sharad Kumar Sharma, J.
In a claim by a partner, to the proceedings for
restitution of conjugal rights, it has to be settled first
that the restitution which has been sought from the
other spouse is only when it is settled that the person
has for no good valid reason has deliberately not
discharged his or her matrimonial obligations or has
intentionally and permanently intended to desert which
is the basic element to sustain a sound and a peaceful
marriage. Whenever a partner to the marriage
withdraws herself or himself from the society of the
other without valid reason withdrawal from Society of
2
other, this is often determined as to be a cruelty
against the other who
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.