HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Sri Narayan Singh Dhanik
NARESH PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT
NAINITAL
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1383 OF 2021
(Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India)
Naresh Pandey
…...
Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand & Others
.…Respondents
Ms. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms.
Chetna Latwal, Advocate for the petitioner
Mr. V.K. Jemini, Dy. Advocate General, assisted by Ms.
Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder for the State.
Judgment reserved on : 7.9.2021
Judgment delivered on: 24.9.2021
Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.
The writ petitioner has filed the present
writ petition praying for quashing of history-sheet
No. 7A, dated 14.7.2020, issued/opened by the
Officer-in-charge, Police Station Bhowali, District
Nainital, under Regulation 228 of the U.P. Police
Regulations,
as
applicable
in
the
State
of
Uttarakhand.
2. The petitioner contends that he is
Vyapar Mandal Adhyaksha, Bhowali and is a
reputed person and also contested the election of
Chairman of Nagar Palika Parishad, Bhowali. The
2
petitioner keeps on espousing the public causes and
for this reason, the rival people, in collusi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.