SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Online)(UK) 8

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Sri Narayan Singh Dhanik
NARESH PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1383 OF 2021

(Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India)

Naresh Pandey

…...

Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & Others

.…Respondents

Ms. Pushpa Joshi, Senior Advocate, assisted by Ms.

Chetna Latwal, Advocate for the petitioner

Mr. V.K. Jemini, Dy. Advocate General, assisted by Ms.

Mamta Joshi, Brief Holder for the State.

Judgment reserved on : 7.9.2021

Judgment delivered on: 24.9.2021

Hon’ble N.S. Dhanik, J.

The writ petitioner has filed the present

writ petition praying for quashing of history-sheet

No. 7A, dated 14.7.2020, issued/opened by the

Officer-in-charge, Police Station Bhowali, District

Nainital, under Regulation 228 of the U.P. Police

Regulations,

as

applicable

in

the

State

of

Uttarakhand.

2. The petitioner contends that he is

Vyapar Mandal Adhyaksha, Bhowali and is a

reputed person and also contested the election of

Chairman of Nagar Palika Parishad, Bhowali. The

2

petitioner keeps on espousing the public causes and

for this reason, the rival people, in collusi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top