SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(UK) 1

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Nattha Singh – Appellant
Versus
Raj Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
['SIDDHARTHA SINGH', '', 'P S BISHT', 'KULDEEP S RAWAL', 'VIKAS KUMAR GUGLANI']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAINITAL

Civil Revision No.60 of 2015

Nattha Singh

… Revisionist

vs.

Raj Kumar

… Respondent

AND

Civil Revision No.61 of 2015

Jagjeet Singh

… Revisionist

vs.

Raj Kumar

… Respondent

AND

Civil Revision No.62 of 2015

Pankaj Mehta

… Revisionist

vs.

Raj Kumar

… Respondent

AND

Civil Revision No.63 of 2015

Shyam Sunder

… Revisionist

vs.

Raj Kumar

… Respondent

Mr. Siddhartha Singh, Advocate with Mr. P. S. Bisht, Advocate present for the revisionists.

Mr. Vikas Kumar Guglani, Advocate present for the respondent.

-2-

U. C. Dhyani, J. (Oral)

1.

Since the subject matter of the aforesaid Civil Revisions is

similar, therefore, all are being decided together by this common

judgment for the sake of brevity and convenience.

2.

All the aforesaid Civil Revisions no.60/2015, 61/2015

62/2015 & 63/2015 have been filed against the common

judgment and order dated 08.05.2015 passed by the Judge,

Small Causes Court / Additio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top