SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(UK) 11

Sanjay Narang – Appellant
Versus
Jakir Hussain – Respondent


Advocates:
['ADITYA SINGH', '', 'PRAGYANAND TIWARI', 'BIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI']

IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Civil Contempt Petition No. 431 of 2018

Sanjay Narang

....... Petitioner

Vs.

Shri Jakir Hussain

…....Respondent

Mr. Aditya Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. B.S. Adhikari, Advocate for the respondent.

Hon’ble Sudhanshu Dhulia, J. (Oral)

This is a contempt petition filed by the

petitioner alleging that the respondent has willfully and

deliberately violated the order of this Court dated

10.01.2018 passed in Review Application No.941 of 2017

in Special Appeal No.645 of 2014.

2.

This case has a chequered history. The

petitioner had raised a construction in the Cantonment

area, which was against the bye-laws of the Cantonment

Board as well as against the Works of Defence Act, 1903.

3.

The case of the Cantonment Board was that

firstly the petitioner had raised the construction within 50

meters of a defence establishment, and hence violated the

Works of Defence Act, 1903. In any case, since the

construction raised by the petitioner was not authorized

under the Cantonment Act, 2006, a demolition order was

passed. Consequently, a writ petition be

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top