HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal Against Order No. 43 of 2026 Smt. Harshi Bhtra and another …......... Applicants Vs.

Smt. Namrata Kalra and others …….....Respondents Present: Mr. T.S. Bindra (through video conferencing) and Mr. Rachit Mangalik, Advocates for the appellant.

Ms. Samridhi Arora (through video conferencing) and Mr. Mehul Joshi, Advocates holding brief of Ms. Medhavi Divya Saxena, Advocate for the respondents.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

The challenge in this appeal is made to Order dated

22.12.2025, passed in Original Suit No.117 of 2025, Smt. Namrata Kalra and others Vs. Ishwar Chand and others, by the court of Civil Judge (Sr. Div.), Dehradun (“the Suit”), by which, while deciding an Application-6 C-2, under Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“the Code”) parties were directed to maintain status quo qua the property in the suit.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the order is not in accordance with law. In paras 25 and 26 of the impugned order, the court has merely recorded that it would be justified if the parties are directed to maintain status qu