SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(UK) 391

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION DIVISION PWD NARENDRA NAGAR TEHRI GARHWAL – Appellant
Versus
DHANCHAND RAMOLA – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No and Registrar’s order with Signatures SA No.27 of 2013 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.

Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel for the State/appellants.

2. Mr. Dinesh Gahatori, Advocate for the proposed LRs of the deceased/respondents.

3. This is an admitted second appeal having been admitted on 15.06.2017.

4. The sole respondent has met with demise on 10.10.2018. Since there is delay in preferring the substitution application, the same is accompanied with Delay Condonation Application in Setting Aside the Abatement.

5. In the affidavit in support of the Delay Condonation Application, it has been stated that the fact regarding the death of the respondent came to the knowledge of the appellants when the counsel for the deceased reported regarding his death to the Hon’ble Court on 26.03.2019 by way of Miscellaneous Application. Immediately, on receipt of intimation regarding the death of the respondent, the counsel for the appellants called upon the department concerned for moving the present substitution application. Prior to receipt of the intimation regarding the death of the respondents, the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top