HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION DIVISION PWD NARENDRA NAGAR TEHRI GARHWAL – Appellant
Versus
DHANCHAND RAMOLA – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS No and Registrar’s order with Signatures SA No.27 of 2013 Hon’ble Siddhartha Sah, J.
Mr. I.P. Kohli, Standing Counsel for the State/appellants.
2. Mr. Dinesh Gahatori, Advocate for the proposed LRs of the deceased/respondents.
3. This is an admitted second appeal having been admitted on 15.06.2017.
4. The sole respondent has met with demise on 10.10.2018. Since there is delay in preferring the substitution application, the same is accompanied with Delay Condonation Application in Setting Aside the Abatement.
5. In the affidavit in support of the Delay Condonation Application, it has been stated that the fact regarding the death of the respondent came to the knowledge of the appellants when the counsel for the deceased reported regarding his death to the Hon’ble Court on 26.03.2019 by way of Miscellaneous Application. Immediately, on receipt of intimation regarding the death of the respondent, the counsel for the appellants called upon the department concerned for moving the present substitution application. Prior to receipt of the intimation regarding the death of the respondents, the appellant
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.